Ah, to be logged. To log or not to log. Lunchtime is an hour for logging, but not a time for logging hours. Loggingly, he logged his memories to his log-term memory whilst dreaming of… I didn’t want to do this. I didn’t want to blog on all day about logs. I wanted to be… a Lumberjack! A Logger, if you will. Wait, wait, wait… that’s the same thing I was doing. And if you liked that… It’s better than bad, it’s good. All kids love Log. It’s…
Speaking of logs, it’s… the Stüphaus Weblog Re-launch (redux, reload, rewhatnot, rewhathaveyou). Commence dance of joy now. Dance it, you… <with fist shaking>
It was time for a rebirth, given that it’s nigh the second anniversary of the inception and about one year of more or less death. Like Jebus. Rising up on the Third, yo. It’s what the Jesi do.
What would Jesus do? I dunno, turn water into wine. Go into business with the excess? That’d require some serious marketing skills (apart from the whole “Son of God Wine” thing which would probably sell favorably) as he’d have no vineyard. It’d be a bit sketchy proposition to have wines produced without vines. What vintage is this Christus? they would ask, to which the answer would be “It was a tap after filtration at the local water treatment plant, and then a 8/10/2010 10:18 PM Blessing.” Mmm, they would respond, this may be the best wine we’ve ever had. Oh, it’s quite simply divine!
(or de-vine, ha!) Oh you poor sick bastard.
The Stüphaus took some time out from this earth on account of my no longer living in San Francisco, not having trusty Interweb access at all times, and working on some projects with long hours. It was then forgotten for convenience’s sake in 2010. More recently, during discussion with a seemingly cool girl (who like most all other cool girls wanted no Stüpefaction) with a cool blog, the thought came to re-launch with something more of a purpose.
And so, what was the purpose? The question under the microscope and in subsequent conversations with cooler people (not necessarily with cooler blogs) was such, what should be the purpose of a nicerer, newerer Stüphaus?
Focus
The general focus of re-launch was to be writing. Categories of free, poetrisms and storyllogicals. The poetrism, being not quite poetry as I am not quite poetic — like a parallelogram, but not quite a square. The illogic of stories being the general suspension of disbelief. The freewrites, well, that’s just a mess/mass mishmash of consciousness that needs to be tidied up for general distribution and consumption. Water, wine, anyone? Writing from a design, creation, musing and reflective standpoint. The what-is-it-about and why-is-it-about-what-it’s-about and the does-it-really-express-what-I-think-what-and-why-it’s-about and does-it-help-the-reader-understand-or-explore-the-what-and-why? That’s what it’s all about in the mix.
“Ism’s in my opinion are not good. A person should not believe in an -ism, he should believe in himself.” I’m not as worried about isms as is Ferris Bueller. And of course, the next line in the film refers to John as the walrus, when a better reference for Lennon believing in himself would be from his song, God. “I don’t believe in Beatles/I just believe in me/Yoko and me.” And so I propose the following edit to the film, perhaps in a Director’s Cut with some new CGI effects, “Ism’s in my opinion are not good. A person should not believe in an -ism, he should believe in himself. And Yoko.” Well, I had a chuckle over it.
Whoops, got off on a tangent there. Plus, the original line in the film about the walrus and bumming rides still works. And Yoko.
Of course, watching the conception, re-visioning, editing and culmination of an eventual completion of a poem or story could take years. But add to that the occasionally interesting freewrite, aside or commentary and perhaps a Lego update and… and… crap. That’s almost exactly what the old Stüphaus was + the published product. So here we have it, the new Stüp, the old Stüp. The real change? A revitalization of intention to post to it.
Let us begin modestly. I’m not about to share something that’s been in the works, in fact I would hope to mostly demonstrate new material here. Sondern, a story behind a poem. Two stories behind it, at that.
Story 1: Last weekend a crew and I went out on the town for The Arabian Canadian’s brief appearance back in the Emerald City. There was joviality and singing and drinking. At one bar, named Kings, there was a chance meeting. I was sitting down when a man leaned over and tapped me, and asked me if I went where I had gone to school. Oddly enough, I had. And lo and behold, there was a girl I recognized, sitting on the other side of him, saying hello. Although our names weren’t immediately on the tips of each other’s tongues, we had a hello and brief re-introduction. The two of them are getting married in a couple of weeks now. Congratulations! What I then began to think of was, ah, yes, so it is her. And still quite lovely. Anyway, let’s call her Caitlin as that’s her name. (Note: The Stüphaus rarely acknowledges actual people’s names because those are private (hence The Arabian Canadian – who’s not Arabian, but we know who he is. But as we’ll most likely never see her again we can call her by name.) The other thought that I had was that I had written a poem about her. Not for her, mind you, but about her. And therein lies a distinct and tremendous difference which is not about to be discussed in this post.
Story 2: See, back in the year 2003 Caitlin and I were in a writing class together. As it’s pertinent to the story, yes, she was absolutely gorgeous. One day I was walking to our class and the light was right and the wind was right and the girl was right. You know how you have people in your class who aren’t really friends but you’ve worked together a bit on writing and you’re going to see each other again in about three minutes when class starts so you give the nod/acknowledgement/smile/yo whatever your greeting is? She was talking to a couple of folks but we did the acknowledgement of some sort around them. And that moment was one of those moments where you realize how stunning someone or something can be.
An “ahh” moment of beauty. The moment of clarity that all those writers and artists refer to in all manners of terms and languages and media, but with the same meaning. Voila, poetrism!
Although it’s trite, I’ve always liked this poem. And how often do you find an excuse to use the word susurrous?
Without further ado… Caitlin, wherever you may be, here’s the poem I wrote about you. I hope you have a fine wedding and life.
girl, in zen
the wind thru the pines
drops from susurrous to a drone.
some roar of nature,
a waterfall, only varying,
two lovers joined.
and your hair is flying to the side
of your head, and a few strands of silk
traverse your lips.


